- Percutaneous
Radiofrequency Neurotomy
- Is
It Right For Your Chronic Neck Pain Patient?
-
By
Daniel J. Murphy, D.C.
-
-
In 1988, an article from SPINE(1), showed that 71% of
patients with
- neck
pain, shoulder pain, or headache could be relieved with diagnostic
- medial
branch blocks of the cervical zygapophysial joints.
-
-
In 1992, a prospective article from SPINE(2) involving 318
patients
- concluded
that “cervical zygapophysial joint pain is not rare.”
-
-
In 1993, an article from PAIN(3) determined that in chronic
- post-traumatic
neck pain patients, that:
-
41% of the pain was from both a disc and a zygapophysial
joint at the
- same
segmental level.
-
23% of the pain was from a zygapophysial joint only.
-
20% of the pain was from a disc only.
-
Therefore, 64% of the pain was from zygapophysial joint
involvement,
- and 61%
was from disc involvement. However,
it is important to note
- that
only 23% of the patient’s pain came solely from the zygapophysial
- joint
alone.
-
-
In 1995, a double-blind study from SPINE(4) using diagnostic
blocks of
- the
cervical zygapophysial joints, concluded that the “cervical
- zygapophysial
joint pain was the most common source of chronic neck pain
- after
whiplash.”
-
-
In 1996, a double-blind placebo-controlled study from
SPINE(5) using
- diagnostic
blocks of the cervical zygapophysial joints, concluded that
- “For
patients with chronic neck pain after whiplash injury, cervical
- zygapophysial
joint pain is extraordinarily common.”
-
-
These studies clearly indicate the the primary source of
chronic neck
- pain,
including post-whiplash chronic neck pain, is the zygapophysial
- joints.
The question of how to best treat the involved zygapophysial
- joint
remains.
-
-
In 1994, an article from THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF
MEDICINE(6)
- concluded
that intraarticular injection of corticosteroids was “not
- effective
therapy for pain in the cervical zygapophysial joints after a
- whiplash
injury.” Consequently,
another approach to treatment is necessary.
-
-
In 1996, an article from THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF
MEDICINE(7)
- concluded
that a procedure termed “percutaneous radiofrequency
- neurotomy”
on chronic zygapophysial joint pain whiplash patients, could
- achieve
at least 50% of subjective pain relief for an average of about 9
- months.
-
-
I found a chapter in a book (8) detailing the percutaneous
- radiofrequency
neurotomy procedure, including pictures.
-
- From
these references, several key points should be made concerning the
- percutaneous
radiofrequency neurotomy procedure:
-
- 1.
The percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy treatment is only
- applicable
to those whose pain arises solely from a single zygapophysial
- joint.
Recall (from ref. 3) that this represents approximately 23%
of
- those
with chronic neck pain.
-
- 2.
Recall that the only way to determine if a patient’s
chronic neck
- pain
arises form a single zygapophysial joint is to use a protocol of
- two
different blinded diagnostic nerve blocks to the zygapophysial
- joints,
and have the patient respond appropriately in terms of both pain
- relief
and appropriate window
for that anesthetic. This
also requires fluoroscopy
-
- 3.
For the percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy procedure to
work
- successfully,
multiple (9-12) lesions to the nerve must be made.
-
- 4.
The percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy procedure is a
three hour
- hospital
operative neuroablative procedure done with a local anesthetic.
-
- 5.
The procedure does not cure the patient, but gives the
patients
- longer
lasting relief. The
patient’s pain recurs as the coagulated
- nerve
heals, usually in 9-15 months.
-
-
Two recent review articles include sections on percutaneous
- radiofrequency
neurotomy for chronic whiplash patients.
-
David Ketroser, MD, notes:
-
- 1.
Chronic whiplash injury neck pain is caused by zygapophyseal
joint damage.
-
- 2.
Technology advances with cineradiography on human volunteers
has
- shown
that the zygapophysial joint is injured because the vertebrae
- rotate
backward in extension without the backward translation on the
- subjacent
vertebra that would occur during normal cervical extension.
- “The
[facet joint] collision occurs because there is no backward
- translation
of each vertebra as it rotates backward.”
-
- 3.
Using fluoroscopy to verify placement, one can diagnostically
- anesthetize
the z-joints individually.
-
- 4.
Once a painful z-joint is identified, the patients are
referred for
- repeat
blocks using a different anesthetic agent.
Because of their
- significantly
different durations of anesthesia, lidocaine is often used
- for one
test and marcaine for the other.
-
- 5.
“Whiplash-injured patients commonly have pain from more
than one z-joint.”
-
- 6.
Radiofrequency z-joint blocks have been found to provide pain
relief
- for the
majority of patients who have been properly evaluated as having
- z-joint
pain.
-
- 7.
“The radiofrequency blocks are performed by inserting a
small probe
- beside
the z-joint nerve and inducing a roughly 2 mm by 5 mm burn that
- interrupts
the nerve.” This
provides pain relief for an average of 9
- months
to 15 months.
-
-
Bogduk and Teasell (10) note:
-
- 1.
“The international literature on the symptoms of whiplash
is
- remarkably
consistent.” The symptoms defy language barriers, which
- argues
in favor of a genuine pathology. “It is hard to accept that the
- symptoms
of whiplash are the result of an international, translingual
- conspiracy
among malingerers.”
-
- 2.
Epidemiological studies, using double-blind, controlled,
diagnostic
- blocks,
have shown that zygapophysial joint pain is the single most
- common
basis for chronic neck pain after whiplash, accounting for at
- least
50%, and up to 80% of patient’s pain.
-
- 3.
Experiments on healthy volunteers indicate that during
whiplash
- motion,
the lower cervical vertebrae undergo extension without
- translation,
causing impact injury to the zygapophysial joints.
-
- 4.
Zygapophysial joint pain cannot be diagnosed clinically or by
medical
- imaging.
The diagnosis relies on fluoroscopically guided, controlled
- diagnostic
blocks of the painful joint.
-
- 5.
The percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy therapy for
cervical facet
- joint
pain targets the medial branches of the cervical dorsal rami that
- innervate
the painful facet joint. The procedure has been validated in a
- randomized
double-blind controlled trial, and yet the “pain recurs as
- the
nerves regenerate, over a period of just less than 1 year.”
-
-
In a very recent review article (11), Bogduk notes:
-
- 1.
“Percutaneous radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy is the
one
- invasive
treatment for neck pain that has been subjected to a
- double-blind,
controlled trial, and is the only treatment for chronic
- neck
pain after whiplash that has been rigorously tested and reported.
- The
procedure confers complete relief in some 70% of patients diagnosed
- as
suffering from cervical zygapophyseal joint pain on the basis of
- placebo-controlled,
diagnostic blocks of the painful joint, and
- therefore
its efficacy is not due to placebo.”
-
- 2.
“The pain-relief is not permanent.”
-
- 3.
“The procedure, however, is limited by its ardor and the
possibility
- of
technical failures. Its utility can be corrupted if used by
untrained
- or
inexperienced operators.”
-
-
Based on the above, I believe that before one of us decides
that
- percutaneous
radiofrequency neurotomy is appropriate for one of our
- patients,
one should consider:
-
- 1.
Percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy is only affective
therapy on
- those
who have then shown to have 100% of their pain arising from a
- single
zygapophysial joint. Studies
indicate that this would amount to
- approximately
23% of those with chronic neck pain following whiplash
- trauma.
-
- 2.
One can only determine if a patient's chronic neck pain is
arising
- from a
single zygapophysial joint by employing a rigorous double
- anesthetic
joint block at different times, and both the under
- fluoroscopy.
This is both invasive and results in exposure to ionizing
- radiation.
-
- 3.
Of the 23% of chronic whiplash neck pain patients whose
blinded
- diagnostic
blocks have shown that they are appropriate candidates for
- this
procedure, the procedure is helpful in approximately 70% of such
- patients.
This would represent approximately 16% of the total patient's
- who are
suffering from chronic post-whiplash neck pain.
-
- 4.
The procedure itself is three hours in duration at a
hospital.
- During
this time the patient is being exposed to flouroscopic ionizing
- radiation.
The procedure is invasive and expensive.
-
- 5.
The procedure is complicated and a froth with technical
failures.
-
- 6.
When the procedure works properly, it is not considered a
cure.
- The
patient's pain will return in an average time of between 9 to 15
- months.
-
- Consequently,
do not let anyone convince you that this procedure is a
- panacea
for your chronic whiplash neck pain patients.
-
- Respectfully
submitted.
-
- Dan
Murphy, D.C.
-
-
- References
-
- 1.
Bogduk N, Marsland A; The cervical zygapophysial joints as a
source
- of neck
pain;Spine; 1988Jun; 13(6):610-7.
-
- 2.
April C, Bogduk N; The prevalence of cervical zygapophysial
joint
- pain. A
first approximation;Spine; 1992Jul; 17(7):744-7.
-
- 3.
Bogduk N, April C; On the nature of neck pain, discography,
and
- cervical
zygapophysial joint blocks; Pain; 1993Aug; 54(2):213-7.
-
- 4.
Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N; The prevalence of
chronic
- cervical
zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash;Spine; 1995Jan; 20(1):20-
- 5.
-
- 5.
Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N; Chronic cervical
- zygapophysial
joint pain after whiplash. A
placebo-controlled
- prevalence
study;Spine; 1996Aug; 21(15):1737-44.
-
- 6.
Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N; Lack of effect of
- intraarticular
corticosteroids for chronic pain in the cervical
- zygapophysial
joints;NEJM; 1994Apr 14; 330(15):1047-50.
-
- 7.
Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, McDonald GJ, Bogduk N;
Percutaneous
- radio-frequency
neurotomy for chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain;
- NEJM;
1996Dec 5; 335(23):1721-6.
-
- 8.
Bogduk N; “Cervical Zygapophysial Joint Pain and
Percutaneous
- Neurotomy”;
Chapter 22 in Whiplash Injuries, Ganaburg R and Szpalski M;
- Lipponcott-Raven,
1998.
-
- 9.
Ketroser DB; Whiplash, Chronic Neck Pain, and Zygapophyseal Joint
- Disorders.
A Selective Review; Minnesota
Medicine, February 2000,
- Volume
83, pp 51-54.
-
- 10.
Bogduk N, Teasell R; Controversies in Neurology: Whiplash:
The
- Evidence
for an Organic Etiology; Arch Neurol, Vol. 57 No. 4, April
- 2000,
590-91.
-
- 11.
Bogduk N, Whiplash: “Why
Pay for What Does not Work?”; J of
- Musculoskeletal
Pain; Vol. 8(1/2) 2000, 29-53.

|
CONTENTS
Attitude Adjustment
Biomechanical & Neuro
responses to Adjustment
Communicating From the Inside
Out
Normal Values in Anatomy,
Physiology, Disease and Chiropractic
Thermography Mis-Education
Attitude Adjustment
2nd CBP® Seminar in Japan
Financial Repriortization
Ambulatory Translational Traction
If you havent read Palmer...?
Percutaneous Radiofrequency
Neurotomy...
|