AJCC October 2000

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Neurotomy
Is It Right For Your Chronic Neck Pain Patient?
 

By Daniel J. Murphy, D.C.

 
            In 1988, an article from SPINE(1), showed that 71% of patients with
neck pain, shoulder pain, or headache could be relieved with diagnostic
medial branch blocks of the cervical zygapophysial joints.
 
            In 1992, a prospective article from SPINE(2) involving 318 patients
concluded that “cervical zygapophysial joint pain is not rare.”
 
            In 1993, an article from PAIN(3) determined that in chronic
post-traumatic neck pain patients, that:
            41% of the pain was from both a disc and a zygapophysial joint at the
same segmental level.
            23% of the pain was from a zygapophysial joint only.
            20% of the pain was from a disc only.
            Therefore, 64% of the pain was from zygapophysial joint involvement,
and 61% was from disc involvement.  However, it is important to note
that only 23% of the patient’s pain came solely from the zygapophysial
joint alone.
 
            In 1995, a double-blind study from SPINE(4) using diagnostic blocks of
the cervical zygapophysial joints, concluded that the “cervical
zygapophysial joint pain was the most common source of chronic neck pain
after whiplash.”
 
            In 1996, a double-blind placebo-controlled study from SPINE(5) using
diagnostic blocks of the cervical zygapophysial joints, concluded that
“For patients with chronic neck pain after whiplash injury, cervical
zygapophysial joint pain is extraordinarily common.”
 
            These studies clearly indicate the the primary source of chronic neck
pain, including post-whiplash chronic neck pain, is the zygapophysial
joints.  The question of how to best treat the involved zygapophysial
joint remains.
 
            In 1994, an article from THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE(6)
concluded that intraarticular injection of corticosteroids was “not
effective therapy for pain in the cervical zygapophysial joints after a
whiplash injury.”  Consequently, another approach to treatment is necessary.
 
            In 1996, an article from THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE(7)
concluded that a procedure termed “percutaneous radiofrequency
neurotomy” on chronic zygapophysial joint pain whiplash patients, could
achieve at least 50% of subjective pain relief for an average of about 9
months. 
 
            I found a chapter in a book (8) detailing the percutaneous
radiofrequency neurotomy procedure, including pictures.
 
From these references, several key points should be made concerning the
percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy procedure:
 
1.         The percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy treatment is only
applicable to those whose pain arises solely from a single zygapophysial
joint.  Recall (from ref. 3) that this represents approximately 23% of
those with chronic neck pain.
 
2.         Recall that the only way to determine if a patient’s chronic neck
pain arises form a single zygapophysial joint is to use a protocol of
two different blinded diagnostic nerve blocks to the zygapophysial
joints, and have the patient respond appropriately in terms of both pain
relief and  appropriate window for that anesthetic.  This also requires fluoroscopy
 
3.         For the percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy procedure to work
successfully, multiple (9-12) lesions to the nerve must be made.
 
4.         The percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy procedure is a three hour
hospital operative neuroablative procedure done with a local anesthetic.
 
5.         The procedure does not cure the patient, but gives the patients
longer lasting relief.  The patient’s pain recurs as the coagulated
nerve heals, usually in 9-15 months.
 
            Two recent review articles include sections on percutaneous
radiofrequency neurotomy for chronic whiplash patients.
            David Ketroser, MD, notes:
 
1.         Chronic whiplash injury neck pain is caused by zygapophyseal joint damage.
 
2.         Technology advances with cineradiography on human volunteers has
shown that the zygapophysial joint is injured because the vertebrae
rotate backward in extension without the backward translation on the
subjacent vertebra that would occur during normal cervical extension.
“The [facet joint] collision occurs because there is no backward
translation of each vertebra as it rotates backward.”
 
3.         Using fluoroscopy to verify placement, one can diagnostically
anesthetize the z-joints individually.
 
4.         Once a painful z-joint is identified, the patients are referred for
repeat blocks using a different anesthetic agent.  Because of their
significantly different durations of anesthesia, lidocaine is often used
for one test and marcaine for the other.
 
5.         “Whiplash-injured patients commonly have pain from more than one z-joint.”
 
6.         Radiofrequency z-joint blocks have been found to provide pain relief
for the majority of patients who have been properly evaluated as having
z-joint pain.
 
7.         “The radiofrequency blocks are performed by inserting a small probe
beside the z-joint nerve and inducing a roughly 2 mm by 5 mm burn that
interrupts the nerve.”  This provides pain relief for an average of 9
months to 15 months.
 
            Bogduk and Teasell (10) note:
 
1.         “The international literature on the symptoms of whiplash is
remarkably consistent.” The symptoms defy language barriers, which
argues in favor of a genuine pathology. “It is hard to accept that the
symptoms of whiplash are the result of an international, translingual
conspiracy among malingerers.”
 
2.         Epidemiological studies, using double-blind, controlled, diagnostic
blocks, have shown that zygapophysial joint pain is the single most
common basis for chronic neck pain after whiplash, accounting for at
least 50%, and up to 80% of patient’s pain.
 
3.         Experiments on healthy volunteers indicate that during whiplash
motion, the lower cervical vertebrae undergo extension without
translation, causing impact injury to the zygapophysial joints.
 
4.         Zygapophysial joint pain cannot be diagnosed clinically or by medical
imaging. The diagnosis relies on fluoroscopically guided, controlled
diagnostic blocks of the painful joint.
 
5.         The percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy therapy for cervical facet
joint pain targets the medial branches of the cervical dorsal rami that
innervate the painful facet joint. The procedure has been validated in a
randomized double-blind controlled trial, and yet the “pain recurs as
the nerves regenerate, over a period of just less than 1 year.”
 
            In a very recent review article (11), Bogduk notes:
 
1.         “Percutaneous radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy is the one
invasive treatment for neck pain that has been subjected to a
double-blind, controlled trial, and is the only treatment for chronic
neck pain after whiplash that has been rigorously tested and reported.
The procedure confers complete relief in some 70% of patients diagnosed
as suffering from cervical zygapophyseal joint pain on the basis of
placebo-controlled, diagnostic blocks of the painful joint, and
therefore its efficacy is not due to placebo.”
 
2.         “The pain-relief is not permanent.”
 
3.         “The procedure, however, is limited by its ardor and the possibility
of technical failures. Its utility can be corrupted if used by untrained
or inexperienced operators.”
 
            Based on the above, I believe that before one of us decides that
percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy is appropriate for one of our
patients, one should consider:
 
1.         Percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy is only affective therapy on
those who have then shown to have 100% of their pain arising from a
single zygapophysial joint.  Studies indicate that this would amount to
approximately 23% of those with chronic neck pain following whiplash
trauma. 
 
2.         One can only determine if a patient's chronic neck pain is arising
from a single zygapophysial joint by employing a rigorous double
anesthetic joint block at different times, and both the under
fluoroscopy.  This is both invasive and results in exposure to ionizing
radiation.
 
3.         Of the 23% of chronic whiplash neck pain patients whose blinded
diagnostic blocks have shown that they are appropriate candidates for
this procedure, the procedure is helpful in approximately 70% of such
patients.  This would represent approximately 16% of the total patient's
who are suffering from chronic post-whiplash neck pain. 
 
4.         The procedure itself is three hours in duration at a hospital.
During this time the patient is being exposed to flouroscopic ionizing
radiation.  The procedure is invasive and expensive. 
 
5.         The procedure is complicated and a froth with technical failures. 
 
6.         When the procedure works properly, it is not considered a cure.
The patient's pain will return in an average time of between 9 to 15
months.
 
Consequently, do not let anyone convince you that this procedure is a
panacea for your chronic whiplash neck pain patients.  
 
Respectfully submitted.
 
Dan Murphy, D.C.
 
 
References
 
1.         Bogduk N, Marsland A; The cervical zygapophysial joints as a source
of neck pain;Spine; 1988Jun; 13(6):610-7.
 
2.         April C, Bogduk N; The prevalence of cervical zygapophysial joint
pain. A first approximation;Spine; 1992Jul; 17(7):744-7.
 
3.         Bogduk N, April C; On the nature of neck pain, discography, and
cervical zygapophysial joint blocks; Pain; 1993Aug; 54(2):213-7.
 
4.         Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N; The prevalence of chronic
cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash;Spine; 1995Jan; 20(1):20-
5.
 
5.         Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N; Chronic cervical
zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash.  A placebo-controlled
prevalence study;Spine; 1996Aug; 21(15):1737-44.
 
6.         Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N; Lack of effect of
intraarticular corticosteroids for chronic pain in the cervical
zygapophysial joints;NEJM; 1994Apr 14; 330(15):1047-50.
 
7.         Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, McDonald GJ, Bogduk N; Percutaneous
radio-frequency neurotomy for chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain;
NEJM; 1996Dec 5; 335(23):1721-6.
 
8.         Bogduk N; “Cervical Zygapophysial Joint Pain and Percutaneous
Neurotomy”; Chapter 22 in Whiplash Injuries, Ganaburg R and Szpalski M;
Lipponcott-Raven, 1998.
 
9.         Ketroser DB;  Whiplash, Chronic Neck Pain, and Zygapophyseal Joint
Disorders.  A Selective Review;  Minnesota Medicine, February 2000,
Volume 83, pp 51-54.
 
10.       Bogduk N, Teasell R; Controversies in Neurology: Whiplash: The
Evidence for an Organic Etiology; Arch Neurol, Vol. 57 No. 4, April
2000, 590-91.
 
11.       Bogduk N, Whiplash:  “Why Pay for What Does not Work?”; J of
Musculoskeletal Pain; Vol. 8(1/2) 2000, 29-53.

Back to CBP® OnLine

 

CONTENTS

Attitude Adjustment

Biomechanical & Neuro responses to Adjustment

Communicating From the Inside Out

Normal Values in Anatomy, Physiology, Disease and Chiropractic

Thermography Mis-Education

Attitude Adjustment

2nd CBP® Seminar in Japan

Financial Repriortization

Ambulatory Translational Traction

If you havent read Palmer...?

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Neurotomy...