CBP® @ ISSLS

Normal Spinal Model

Grassroots Effort

CBP® Cyber Seminars

Miniscule SI Movement

Japanese CBP® Text

VT Denies DCs X-Ray!

Integrity, Mail order Degrees, and the press

Practice Managment

When surgery for Low Back Problems

Mysrteries of the Spine

When to Adjust

X-Ray Digitizing

Omega-3 Fatty Acid Books

Traction History

School Days

 

 

AJCC April 2000

The sum of the parts

is greater than the whole.

  by Dwight DeGeorge, D.C., M.S.

Fifteen years ago when I first began learning about the extraordinary health benefit of extension traction, the available devices were varied and rough. Learning about the past has been a vehicle for my understanding of present times. To appreciate the evolution of extension traction the way it is today and look toward the future, one must appreciate a journey of discovery.

      While I was still getting my license, Dr. Anthony Gambale was adjusting and I spent most of my time putting people in traction. In the mid 1980's, the only strap device used for extension traction involved a chin strap on a leather or nylon band with a weighted ball hanging off of a metal chain. One of the problems with the chin strap was that a lot of people got TMJ symptoms after using it for any duration of time. People were receiving compression traction of the TMJ as well as extension traction of the cervical spine using the available strap systems. It seemed the more weight put on the strap, the worse the TMJ symptoms became. Also, people who felt the need to have control often became claustrophobic while strapped into our traction because they had to rely on the doctor to release the force from their chin and neck. It was my opinion that traction was a necessary component to spinal health for many people but was not practical the way it was. I was so eager to change the lateral curves of the neck that I would go home and come up with all kinds of crazy and sometimes archaic devices to improve the quality of the traction we were doing in the office. Every weekend I came up with different ways to apply the forces of traction but none were as effective as I had hoped.

      One day during this time, Dr. Gambale was watching my wife Lisa in traction and noticed she was holding the strap off her chin with her thumbs and applying force to her forehead. He pointed out how Lisa was positioned and at that moment I realized it. A strap could be used on the forehead instead of the jaw! A forehead strap might eliminate the myriad of devices I was starting to use to try and keep pressure off the TMJ. The angles could be changed a little and the same effect achieved without stressing the jaw!

      The way Lisa took the pressure off her jaw with her thumbs put her into a natural extension but also compressed the posterior elements of her cervical spine. Traction at the time focused more on extension but adding compression had not been done. I was so excited, I became determined to create a traction unit that was results oriented, effective, simple to use, and aesthetically pleasing. I combined my passion for working with wood, architectural design and my genuine love of chiropractic to create a new kind of traction unit, which didn't use the chin to apply force to the neck.

      We spent a lot of time experimenting with our traction system. We would try adding fulcrums and various devices and then would x-ray to see the configuration assumed by the cervical spine. The best way we found to really influence lordosis was in the extension-compression position. It was for this reason the chair developed incorporated a forehead strap designed to place extension-compressive forces on the cervical spine. The rest of the spine was influenced passively by various blocks and cushions while the person was in traction.

      These original traction tables in our office had the patient's lying supine and took a tremendous amount of office space to use. As our office grew and we saw more and more patient visits, we really needed to recoup some space. As an experiment one day I took a Saws-All saw to one of the traction tables and cut the bench down to the size of a chair seat cushion. What we found was that the new dimension of the table was just as effective and in many cases was more comfortable and looked better. Patients could more easily maintain control of the strap on their head and could release themselves if they felt the need. The space demanded from our office was cut nearly in half!

      We really started seeing corrective changes exceeding anything previously observed with the old chin straps. We started sharing the information about our corrections with other chiropractors and some of them wanted to implement the tables in their offices. Because of this, we began to manufacture and sell the traction tables.

      As the new extension compression traction chair was developed, Dr. Don

Harrison realized the great effect this system had on causing dramatic biomechanical improvement. At first, Dr. Harrison didn't believe anyone could

make the changes we were claiming to have in our office. Up to that time, nobody seemed to be making these dramatic changes in the spine. Dr. Harrison came to our office in the late 1980's to verify our claims and observe the corrections we were making first hand.

    Dr. Harrison was excited to note that changes to anterior translation of the head and the atlas plane line were occurring right along with significant

improvement in lordosis. Patients were able to see changes for themselves and reap the benefits of their improved spinal structure and heightened health. With Dr. Harrison's extensive knowledge of mathematics, physics, anatomy, and biomechanics, he began researching the effects observed in patients using this device. Dr. Harrison ultimately showed with scientific research why this method was so effective. Our traction table received a United States patent in August of 1990. What Dr. Harrison didn't know then was that there were even more efficient ways of causing spinal change than the discovery at hand in the late 1980's.

      It would take nearly the next decade of chiropractic efforts to expand active traction to the full spine before it could become truly efficient, practical, and economical. During the 1990's, Dr. Mike Pope was the first person to incorporate a counter-stressing strap system to cervical extension traction. He was responsible for the original advent of Chiropractic Biophysics¨ 2-way cervical traction and obtained a US patent on the technology in 1992. Soon after this, in 1996, Dr. Steven Foster would be the first to patent a 5-point traction unit, which put active forces into all lateral curve components of the spine. Dr. Foster based information for his 5-point traction technology on research being conducted by Chiropractic Biophysics¨. Finally, in the late 1990's, Dr. Deed Harrison began showing effective correction of the lateral component of the lumbar spine using active traction of the region.

      Research conducted by Chiropractic Biophysics¨ coupled with contributions from these traction visionaries has laid the groundwork for the next wave of lateral curve correction. Dr. ' s Harrison along with myself, Dr. Charles Francis and Dr. Leonard Siskin have problem-solved the practicality of full spine traction to restore optimum lateral spinal curves. We are calling it our Target Force Technology.

      This paper shows how the evolution of chiropractic extension traction has been a result of the efforts and insight of many people. Patient health depends on our ability to apply, communicate, and influence the way basic health information is used in our offices. Ever improving understanding of the body and health demand that health products and professional tools stay on the cutting edge to deliver the health and life potential all human beings deserve.